Steer Clear of These Three Poor Learning Models

As an instructional designer, you have been exposed to a plethora of learning models…some far more effective and worthy than others. Here are three instructional design consulting models that should be avoided:

1. Train as many as possible as cheaply as possible. Lecture to a large audience. Test for simple regurgitation of points made. Feed back test scores as if they were a true proof of learning.  While this saves money and time, this approach does not increase proficiency or change behavior.
2. Utilize an any-size-fits-all best practice template. Take a basic course design and fill in the standard blanks with your content.  This becomes a simple exercise of cut and paste with little cost…and of little value.  Effective designs are structured to specific audiences for specific outcomes.
3. Read the screens and click through to the end. Each click shows that the employee has viewed the screen but requires no test of understanding. Many compliance courses are administered this way simply to cover a company’s liability with no transfer of training.

Reject the learning models above. They do not accomplish your objective of true learning and effective performance improvement.